Real fuel consumption of Ford Kuga 2.5 automatic. What is important to know about the fuel consumption of the Ford Kuga. liter diesel, manual transmission

Real reviews from owners about fuel consumption on the Ford Kuga:

Ford Kuga, 2.0 liter diesel manual transmission

• I am very pleased with the efficiency of the diesel engine. I am a hunting enthusiast, so I constantly attach a trailer to my car, where I have a boat, or a snowmobile. In terms of gasoline consumption, the engine is quite economical. So 8 liters per hundred square meters summer period– this is the same well-established norm as fuel consumption in the winter in the tens. I read the reviews myself, but I didn’t fully believe that my Ford Kuga would be so economical.

• Today I noticed that fuel consumption is much lower than the data indicated in the passport. On the highway, my diesel engine rarely exceeds 6 liters, and in the city - 8.2 per 100 km.

• Diesel saves fuel! Along the highway real consumption fuel for a Ford Kuga is 8 liters of gasoline per 100 km, so this is at a speed of 140. I was in Finland, and noticed that fuel consumption at 120 kilometers is 5.6 liters. The savings are just great.

• Dizelek met my expectations. Fuel consumption on the Ford Kuga is especially pleasing on the highway. A full tank is enough for 600 kilometers. Reviews about the car are mostly positive.

2.0 liter diesel, manual transmission gears

• It has never been possible to increase fuel consumption on a Ford Kuga above 6.7 liters per 100 km traveled. This applies to the track. In St. Petersburg, the situation completely depends on driving style and traffic jams. Basically, in the city it consumes about 7 liters per hundred. Impressive, isn't it? So this diesel is very economical!

• On the highway, actual fuel consumption is about 9 liters per 100 km. For a “Kug” - not bad at all. The city eats a lot more, but I bought the car specifically taking into account gasoline consumption on the highway. Interestingly, in the city you can also save a fair amount. Fuel consumption in Yekaterinburg is 12 liters, and traffic jams, I tell you, sometimes stretch for several hundred meters.

2.5 petrol, with automatic transmission

• Very pleased with the choice. In Moscow, with constant traffic jams, the figures do not exceed 13 liters per 100 km. Always remember about the prohibitive weight of the car and its power. Fuel consumption is the main indicator that I paid attention to when buying a car. The computer, by the way, showed me identical real consumption gasoline result. My garage construction is now in full swing, so I often attach the trailer to the car. The results remained virtually unchanged. Only one liter has been added, but I load the trailer to capacity with construction equipment. So, for me, a Kuga with a volume of 2.5 is practically the perfect car. In general, I planned to buy a Gazelle once, but my friends dissuaded me, saying that you would lose more. I believed it - I was not mistaken.

Ford Kuga with a volume of 2.5 liters, gasoline, mileage 185 thousand km

• If you get stuck in constant traffic jams, fuel consumption may slightly exceed the mark of 13 liters of gasoline per 100 km of road, but it is stable - 12. Power and weight, of course, take their toll. What can I say, very economical car. Gasoline consumption does not change much when the air conditioner or heater is turned on. It all depends on the management style. I don’t like hectic starts at traffic lights, so everything is fine. Gasoline consumption is the main reason for my choice of this particular car. I advise everyone. With such power and capacity - ideal vehicle it turns out.

• I fill it exclusively with AI-95. I don't like it when there is not enough power. 12.3 liters – gasoline consumption in the city. Per hundred kilometers on the highway it drops to 10. I was pleased with the 2.5 liter engine, as I thought that fuel consumption would exceed 15 liters.

The level of fuel consumption plays a vital role for Ford Kuga owners, since it directly affects their costs. Moreover, given the price of gasoline and diesel, as well as big choice models on the market, this criterion is beginning to be taken into account even more carefully. In our article today we will talk about the fuel consumption of the Ford Kuga per 100 km, what affects it, and what pitfalls there are.

The latest generation of Ford Kuga has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor and is now equipped with a large number of different systems that make the crossover practical and economical. For example, a direct fuel injection system has a positive effect on 2 components at once:

• Fuel consumption, which is significantly reduced.
• Dynamics, that is, the car becomes much faster.

Fuel consumption indicators

It should be noted that the fuel consumption of the Ford Kuga is influenced by a huge number of different factors, which we will discuss further.

As is known Ford Kuga has several diesel and gasoline engines. Fuel consumption per 100 km is quite modest. For example, according to factory specifications, a 1.6 liter engine (150 hp) with a manual transmission and front-wheel drive consumes:

• In the city - 8.3 liters.
• On the highway - 5.6 liters.
• Mixed cycle - 6.6 liters.

The 2.5-liter has a more serious appetite gasoline engine Duratec, which consumes 11.2 in the city, 6.1 on the highway and about 8 liters in the combined cycle.

Diesel traditionally has lower fuel consumption per 100 km, namely:

• City - 7.4 liters.
• Route – 5.5 liters.
• Mixed cycle - 6.2 liters.

Considering the indicators above, we can conclude that if you need economical crossover, then you need to pay attention to the Ford Kuga with diesel engine. Moreover, its advantage will be excellent traction throughout the entire range.

However, not everything is as simple as it might seem. Reviews from many owners indicate that real fuel consumption differs from the declared one. In most cases, during the first 10,000 km there is an unreasonable appetite, which normalizes over time, but still does not reach the factory level. There can be many reasons for this, which we will discuss further. I would like to note in advance that the manufacturer indicates the minimum possible result that was achieved during testing.

Factors affecting consumption

When Ford Kuga owners say that their car consumes too much fuel, they may not take into account some factors, the main ones being:

• Driving style.
• Technical condition.
• Electrical appliances, etc.

The first factor is more significant, since depending on how fast the driver drives, the level of gasoline (diesel) consumption will be determined. For example, it can differ for different drivers by up to 30%, taking into account the driving style. As you know, sharp accelerations contribute to accelerated fuel consumption. For a gasoline engine, for economical driving, it is better to keep the speed at 2000-3000, and for a diesel engine - 1800-2700.

Also extremely important is the condition of the car, or rather, the condition of the engine, ignition system, battery, wheel alignment, oil, fuel and much more. Moreover, even tire pressure can significantly affect the amount of fuel consumed.

It should be noted that switched on appliances that consume energy also increase Ford Kuga's appetite. For example, an air conditioner can increase its consumption by 10%. Spending time in traffic jams also increases it, so it's best to avoid large crowds of cars.

In general, there are a huge number of different factors that affect the level of fuel consumption. This should be taken into account when measuring flow.

I would like to note a few more situations. Firstly, you should not focus on the indicators obtained in the first 3000-4000 km. The fact is that during break-in, the engine may consume more fuel than it should. Over time, everything will return to normal. Moreover, even the time of year can affect consumption. Secondly, if the car has new tires, then they also need to be run in for a certain time (on average 500 km).

In general, take into account operating conditions and the influence of various factors, and only then measure fuel consumption. As a rule, it may differ from the factory value, which is a normal situation.

The prototype of the car was first shown to the public at the Geneva Motor Show in 2006 - Ford presented its first crossover. Prior to this, concept art of the Kuga could be seen at the Paris Motor Show that same year. The official debut of the car took place in 2008. Externally, the car almost completely embodies the main design characteristics that are inherent in all Ford Motors models. At the same time, the developers did not forget to pay attention to the interior - great emphasis was placed on creating internal space. To enhance the effect, the car is equipped with a glass panoramic roof.

Ford Kuga 1.6 AT+MT

Technical data

Cars in this configuration are equipped with a 1.6-liter engine. The maximum possible speed is from 192 to 200 km per hour. With a power of 150 hp. this unit is unlikely to satisfy fans of street racing and drive, but due to moderate acceleration, the sound effects of the engine seem to compensate for the lack of traction. Fuel consumption in urban areas will be approximately 11 liters, and with full emissions on a city highway - up to 8.5 liters per 100 km.

Owner reviews about consumption

• Artyom, Nizhny Novgorod. This year I bought a Ford Kuga 1.6 AT, 2015. If you don’t pay attention to the fact that it guzzles gasoline mercilessly, then in general there’s really nothing to complain about. In the city, the average is up to 16 liters per 100 km. On the highway, up to 8.5 liters are spent at a speed of 100-120 km/h.
• Peter, Omsk. Ford Kuga 1.6, 2012. Last year I decided to treat myself to a new product. I don’t understand why everyone is complaining so much about the car’s wastefulness - it’s quite standard requests. In the city I manage to burn up to 11 liters per 100 km, and outside the city - almost half as much. But I’m pleased with the design and reliability, because I’ve already found myself in unpleasant situations.
• Marina, Odintsovo. My husband picked out a car for me, he clearly knew better which one would be suitable for a beginner and would not destroy family budget. Our 2015 Kuga 1.6 AT has excellent sound insulation and a conveniently located USB cable. Comfortable, spacious, I like everything. There have been no breakdowns yet, and in terms of consumption - in the combined cycle the engine consumes up to 8 liters of gasoline.
• Alexander, Volgograd. Ford Kuga 1.6, 2013. I bought it brand new. Ford is very dynamic in motion and easy to drive. So far I'm very pleased with it. On high speed doesn't disappoint either. I often travel on business trips on my wheels, and the fuel consumed on average is no more than 8.5 liters per 100 km on the highway.
• Nikolai, Sheksna. I chose a Ford automatic 1.6 so that my wife could drive too. The car is new, 2013. I like the spaciousness and controllability. On the highway, gasoline consumes around 7-9 liters, but with front-wheel drive connected in the city, the engine burns 15 liters.

Ford Kuga 2.0 AT+MT diesel

Fuel consumption rate per 100 km

This modification is a compact, spacious crossover equipped with a diesel engine. fuel system. All generations of Ford Kuga were equipped with a 2-liter engine, but in the second generation the lineup has become much more powerful and economical. The engine is paired with an automatic or manual transmission and is capable of accelerating the car to 100 km per hour in 10.5 seconds. Fuel consumption declared by the manufacturer in the city is 6.0-8.5 liters, on the highway - 4.7-5.8 liters. Maximum speed– up to 202 km per hour.

Real consumption

• Arkady, Moscow. I got an almost new Ford Kuga 2.0 2012 MT 140 hp. with a mileage of 25,000 km. For myself, I noticed the uniqueness of the interior - has no one noticed that the equipment and design have begun to catch up with Audi and BMW? The average consumption in the city is about 9 liters, taking into account traffic jams. It hasn't worked out more economically yet.
• Pavel, Rostov-on-Don. Ford Kuga AT 2.0l (2010 onwards). In the city on my Kuga I managed to invest 8 liters. In general, I wouldn’t refuse a manual, but my wife also drives. Overall everything is fine, and the gearbox is perfect. When we go to the track, I immediately test the declared 163 hp. – diesel consumption at a speed of 120 km/h is exactly 5.2 liters.
• Nikolay, Kazan. Ford Kuga 2.0, 2008, manual. I have long dreamed of sports car, but I had to choose something more practical. Never had any problems with Fords, quality brand, excellent handling. The engine, although 136 hp, is a real monster, high-torque. On the highway it consumes 5.8 liters, and in the city up to 9 liters, no more.
• Dmitry, Suzdal. My swallow Kuga 2013 is in service. AT 140 hp This is the third year now. There are no difficulties in operation, in general I have no reason to be dissatisfied. Except that in winter, at -30, the engine refused to start. Dynamic driving requires about 10 liters of diesel, but on the highway at a speed of 80-85 km/h I can easily fit in about 5-6 liters.
• Vladimir, Chelyabinsk. I bought a 2013 Ford AT. It’s strange, but Moscow traffic jams and traffic lights consume no more than 7.5 liters per hundred – it’s not for nothing that I chose a non-diesel configuration. On the highway, if you don’t drive it, the engine consumes about 6 liters.

Ford Kuga 2.5 AT+MT

About the configuration

Models with 2.5 liter engines have been produced since 2008. In the first generation, these were SUVs with a 200 hp engine, paired with a mechanical or automatic transmission, and since 2012 they were replaced by a 150 hp version. with an automatic transmission and significantly lower fuel consumption - 11.2 liters in the city versus 14.6 liters and 6.5 liters on the highway versus 7.9 liters. Maximum speed is up to 205 km/h (185 km/h in the second generation).

Consumption on Russian roads

• Vladimir, Moscow. Ford Kuga 2.5 AT 2014 I have been driving Ford cars for several years now, the engine is very powerful, the build quality is very good, and there is good maneuverability. Disadvantages: enough high consumption gasoline - I squeeze out 10 liters steadily, expensive maintenance. But overall everything is fine.
• Anastasia, Voronezh. I love the futuristic design of my 2014 Kuga. AT. Unreal driving sensations, this is my second car, so I have something to compare with - the maneuverability is excellent, very spacious salon, great appearance, Very comfortable seats, easily accelerates when overtaking. Per 100 km it consumes only 10-11 liters in the city and up to 7 liters on the highway.
• Victor, Perm. I am the owner of a 2010 Ford Kuga 2.5. Nice model, convenient equipment. I have Small child Therefore, such a machine is simply irreplaceable. The gasoline consumption of such a beast is appropriate - in the city it burns around 15 liters with condr and traffic jams. On the highway the maximum was 12 liters.
• Anatoly, Samara. Ford Kuga 2.5l 2012 This is not my first car. I was not very pleased with the relatively high gas mileage, although the cross-country ability of this model is very good. 200 horses on the track are felt immediately, as is gasoline consumption - an immodest 9 liters per hundred with the stove running. It’s not surprising - such a monster has an appetite to match.
• Danila, St. Petersburg. I received a one-year-old Kuga 2010 2.5, 200 hp as a gift. What can I say - an excellent car of excellent quality. Powerful, stylish, fast. However, you have to pay for these qualities with 95 liter gasoline. In the city, 12.5 liters are spent, although a friend has the same model that consumes all 15 liters.

The Ford Kuga is rightfully considered the most technologically advanced Ford in Europe with stunning design and respectable fuel economy. But since progress does not stand still, and the level of competition is rapidly growing, Ford has recently introduced more fuel economical cars models Ford C-Max And Ford Fusion Hybrid-Mondeo. They have a 2-liter gasoline engine with a power of over 180 hp. and consume no more than 5 liters of fuel per 100 km.

Compact Ford crossover Kuga went on sale in 2008. In 2013, the second generation appeared, and in 2016 the model was restyled. Fierce competition in this segment forced developers to pay close attention to the technical characteristics of the car. The new line of Ford Kuga engines is economical, and their fuel consumption per 100 km is one of the best in its class, which is confirmed by user reviews.

Technical characteristics and official fuel consumption standards of Ford Kuga

When developing this model, Ford engineers managed to find an almost perfect balance between functionality and comfort. The crossover has excellent dynamics and very good cross-country ability due to the use of the Haldex coupling developed by Swedish specialists from Volvo. When going off-road, it transfers part of the traction force to the rear axle.

The first generation offered one 2.5-liter gasoline engine with 200 hp. with excellent dynamics and two 2.0 liter diesel engines. All of them turned out to be very reliable, and the fuel consumption of the Ford Kuga, especially diesel engines, turned out to be very good.

In the second generation, 1.6 liter power units were added with a power of 150 and 182 Horse power. Their specifications provided good traction, while their fuel consumption was significantly reduced. After restyling Ford models Kuga engine capacity was reduced to 1.5 liters with the same power.

First generation 2008-2013

The first generation Ford Kuga was equipped with only one gasoline engines 2.5 liter capacity 200 horsepower. It was paired with an automatic all-wheel drive transmission, which provided the car with good cross-country ability and dynamics. The car accelerated to 100 km/h in 9.7 seconds. At the same time, gasoline consumption was quite high for such a volume: 14.6 liters in the city, 10.2 liters in the combined cycle and 7.9 on the highway.

2.0 liter diesel engines with powers of 140 and 163 hp. had a more modest appetite. With mechanics, these cars consume only 6.2 liters of diesel fuel per 100 km in the combined cycle; in urban mode, this figure is 7.4 liters per 100 km, and on the free road it drops to 5.5 liters of diesel. An automatic transmission and all-wheel drive increase fuel consumption, especially in the city, where it increases to 8.5 liters per hundred. However, this Ford version Kuga is the most popular in terms of fuel consumption, dynamic and operational characteristics.

Second generation 2013-2016

This generation of Kuga came out in 2013 with new, more economical power units. The 2.5 liter engine was derated to 150 hp. WITH new box automatic it showed excellent performance in terms of efficiency: on the highway only 6.5 liters, in the combined cycle 8.2 liters per 100 km, and in the city 11.2 liters of gasoline. The maximum speed has dropped to 185 km/h, but this does not prevent you from feeling confident on any road.

A more affordable version of the Kuga has appeared with a 1.6 engine and a power of 150 horsepower. automatic transmission and mechanics. With a manual transmission in city mode, this engine consumes 8.3 liters of gasoline per 100 km, on the highway only 5.3 liters, and in the combined cycle - 6.6 liters. Automatically with all-wheel drive Fuel consumption increases to 10.2 liters in the city, 6.3 liters on the highway, an average of 7.7 liters. A version with the same volume is offered, boosted to 182 hp, with all-wheel drive with an automatic transmission and similar fuel consumption.

The updated 2.0 diesels consume no more than 6 liters in city traffic, on the free road the consumption is 4.7 liters, and in mixed mode - 5.2 liters.

Restyling 2016

After the restyling of the 2017 Ford Kuga, changes affected not only the appearance, it received new 1.5 liter EcoBoost engines with powers of 150 and 182 hp. and improved dynamic characteristics. They are equipped with only all-wheel drive with an automatic transmission, while on the Ford Kuga fuel consumption has decreased, they consume 9.3 l/100 km in the city, on the highway this figure is 6.2 liters, the average is 7.4 liters.

Factors affecting consumption

Despite the fact that the developers are making every effort to reduce fuel consumption, some owners talk about its gluttony. This is not entirely true; according to expert opinion, very economical engines are installed on the Ford Kuga, but a lot depends on third-party factors. One of them is the transmission, because front-wheel drive options consume less fuel, but this comes at the price of reduced cross-country ability and worse road grip, especially in winter. Other factors also affect consumption:

• driving style helps save up to 25% of fuel, you need to avoid sharp acceleration, and keep the speed in the range of 1800-2600 for diesel engines and from 2000 to 3000 for gasoline versions;
• the condition of the engine, suspension, transmission must be normal, which requires periodic maintenance;
• use of electrical equipment and electronics: if you monitor energy consumption, you can significantly reduce consumption - one air conditioner increases it by an average of 10%;
• seasonal factors - in winter, consumption increases due to prolonged warm-ups and the intake of cold air into the engine; special attention should be paid to changing the car's shoes to winter tires.

➖ Build quality
➖ Ergonomics
➖ Visibility
➖ Fuel consumption

pros

➕ Controllability
➕ Suspension
➕ Patency
➕ Comfortable salon

The advantages and disadvantages of the 2018-2019 Ford Kuga in a new body were identified based on reviews real owners. More detailed benefits and Ford cons Kuga 2nd generation 2.5 and 1.5 turbo with automatic, front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive 4x4 can be found in the stories below:

Owner reviews

The car is comfortable for long hauls over 1,000 km per day. We drove both on highways and on military dirt roads, climbed along scree roads into the mountains (without extreme sports) - Kuga 2 drives confidently, steers when sliding, when stopping on a reverse slope it does not go backwards, you can set off calmly as if on a level road.

Up to 140 km/h the speed is not particularly noticeable; faster it becomes noisy and vibrations appear, but it holds the course confidently even at 160. The car as a whole is balanced, it has no obvious weak points.

The turbocharged engine pulls quite briskly in the city, for sharp overtaking on the highway there is Sport, or the button to lower.

The suspension is more urban on country roads, you can’t go fast, it will go through a virgin field, along rainy forest roads, along a flat beach, it steers nicely. Nothing happened after 30,000 km, the interval between maintenance is 15,000 km. General impression— a typical urban crossover: comfortable, cheerful, with its own pleasant little things.

But at the same time, I don’t like the layout: the body is narrow, high and elongated (compared to its classmates). The wide A-pillar blocks the side view, the mirrors do not fold all the way and end up sticking out, there are footwell lights for some unknown reason, but there is no illumination for the glove compartment, the tailgate has a closing handle on only one side, so if your right hand is busy you have to manage to close and the move is quite hard, a weak woman will have to hang on it.

Igor Suvorov, drives a Ford Kuga 1.6 (150 hp) AWD AT 2015

You can switch the speed on the automatic transmission in manual mode. Very comfortable seats, you get into the car as if you were in a spacecraft. Nice flat square volume luggage compartment with the rear seats folded down.

The Ford Kuga II handles the road excellently, the car is very maneuverable when driving around the city. And it’s very cool to fill up with gas: I opened the hatch and there are no traffic jams, I put the gun in and took out the gun, it’s clean and comfortable.

Gasoline consumption dropped after 40,000 km, sharply, the car began to consume 2 liters less gasoline. It’s strange, why such a long break-in period? In rainy weather, the trunk sometimes does not open with your foot on the first try. Doors also sometimes (very rarely) do not open on the first try with keyless entry.

Yes, for some reason the side windows get dirty very quickly in the rain. There was only one complaint - after 35,000 km, the engine cooling bypass failed, they replaced it under warranty, despite the fact that I never came to the service, I changed the oil and filter myself.

Nikolay Sheryshev, drives a Ford Kuga 1.6 (150 hp) AWD AT 2013

Video review

A very comfortable and pleasant car to drive, many options, a chic panoramic roof, excellent bi-xenon, a very comfortable famous door that opens with your foot, excellent seats that have proven themselves very well on long trips (you can easily drive 1,300 km without stopping), good finishing materials interior, decent dynamics, good brakes, very good sound insulation, comfortable suspension, sharp steering, the car is comfortable at speeds up to 200 km/h.

But there are also some problems: the box squeaks, pushes and kicks, steering rack knocks and asks for replacement, the support bars crunch, the saber has worn holes in the back door down to metal, the keyless entry falls off, the music is complete shit..., the steering column clicks, the speedometer is crooked, the hood vibrates at idle, the trunk door sometimes opens with your foot, sometimes it doesn’t, something creaks, taps, rattles, the tire pressure monitoring system does not work, the washer level sensor does not work either...

In addition to this, I was faced with complete reluctance official dealers do anything within the scope of your warranty obligations. Complete from the word “absolutely”. Deeply frostbitten guys. And I received exactly the same attitude from the parent Russian Ford...

Dmitry Gaidash, drives a Ford Kuga 1.6 (182 hp) AWD automatic 2016.

After we picked it up, we drove the first 200 km - average consumption showed 8.6 liters. In the city, consumption with all warm-ups and idling showed 13.9 liters. It's a smooth ride.

You understand, while I’m running it in, I’m not forcing it. We were leaving the city for a distance of 200 km one way - the consumption was already 7.3 liters. I fill it with 92nd gasoline, the seller advised me to only drive with 92nd, I don’t know how correct this is, what are you filling?

Now the mileage is already around 900 km. The car warms up very quickly, about 5-10 minutes and the temperature needle starts to rise. It feels like it’s not a car, but an airplane; inside it’s quiet, calm and comfortable. The seats also warm up very quickly.

Another big plus that we paid attention to was the airflow for the rear passengers. On Kuga it is a plus for heating the feet. In my opinion, not on the CX-5. We carry the child in the back. Another plus is the tilt-adjustable rear row seats.

I started the car even at -30 degrees (after 12 hours of inactivity), there is no hint at all that the Kuga will not start. The interior is warm, and in the current frosts I can sit comfortably in a T-shirt.

As for handling, it’s generally a blast. There is no feeling of ice or slush between the stripes. When overtaking, everything is smooth and calm, you sit high, the visibility is excellent. Tires cost Nokia 5 R17 (received as a gift from the salon).

Review of Ford Kuga 1.5 turbo (150 hp) with automatic and all-wheel drive 2018

I will compare the Kuga with my previous Suzuki Grand Vitara. Exterior. I like the front. Still, the muzzle adorned this unit. I don’t like the previous body (the front is kind of squinted). On the side, nothing has changed, indifferent. The rear has changed a little for the better.

Salon. The width on the first row is the same as on the Suzuki. The seats are more comfortable. I settled in right away, the lumbar support is good, as is the lateral support. Right leg doesn't get tired.

Vetrovoe windshield heating is a wonderful thing, perhaps the most useful after air conditioning. There is no need to wait for the engine to heat up, and for the warm air to heat up the glass, which means there is no need to make awkward movements with the scraper.

There is quite a lot of space under the hood, but the neck for the washer is a few centimeters higher - it would be more convenient. What I definitely don’t like is the lack of a dipstick for checking the oil in the automatic transmission.

Suspension. A compromise solution. I can evaluate it quite objectively, since every day I walk to and from work along the same path (road). In those places where I remembered everyone, from road workers to our supreme power, with bad words, now I fly by unnoticed, or almost unnoticed.

Engine. What I wanted is what I got. A simple volumetric atmospheric. Some may not have enough traction, but for me the wave is enough, and in extreme cases there is a sport mode. But it only needs to be serviced (oil changed) every 15,000 km. For me it is clear blasphemy.

The owner drives a 2016 Ford Kuga 2.5 (150 hp) AT AWD.

I have a standard set, but it has everything you need. Front-wheel drive. The car handles perfectly both on a dry road and in heavy rain with puddles. Someone wrote that Kuga does not eat ruts - they are lying! Ford can handle it normally; any car will feel this drawback of our roads. On normal roads, off asphalt and after rain, the car drives confidently and does not falter.

The Kuga's handling is excellent and turns perfectly, even on a roundabout. There is no roll during a high-speed approach! Don’t listen to anyone, because I also read somewhere that it can tilt a lot.

This is my first automatic, and it seems to me that the mechanics would be faster. Gear changes are slower than desired. Also frustrating is the expense. On the highway at a speed of 110-130 km/h you need 9.5 - 10 liters, and at 140-150 - already 10-11 liters. In the city - 12 liters.

Review of Ford Kuga 2.5 (150 hp) with automatic transmission 2019