Tire test data 175 65 p14. Summer tires R14: reviews, tests, price, which ones are better to buy? Separate conversation about each tire model

Choice: Summer tire test in size 175/65R14 (2011)This time we get acquainted with the results of tire tests of the Australian magazine Choice.

All drivers need to change tires every few years. You can, of course, again take the model that was included in the factory equipment of the car, but what to do if something does not suit you. To help drivers choose their tires, trade publications around the world hold annual tire tests, and this time we bring you the results of a test conducted by Choice magazine, which has been helping Australian consumers find the best products on the market since 1960.

This year, the Australians tested 18 tires in size 175/65R14, which can be installed on popular models small cars, such as Ford Fiesta Honda Jazz, Hyundai Getz, Mazda2 and Toyota Yaris. The tests were carried out at the Morgan Park Raceway in Warwick (Queensland, Australia).

According to Choice, during this test, the worst tire in the history of testing was found. You will find out what kind of tire it is from the results below.

Tested tires:

• BFGoodrich Sport T/A
• Ecopia EP100
• Continental ContiComfortContact CC5
• SP Sport 300E
• Firestone TZ700
• Goodride Radial SP06
• Goodyear Assurance Armorgrip
• GT Radial Champiro BXT
• Optimo K415
• Ironman iMove
• Kumho Solus KH17
• Maxxis MA-P1
• Energy XM1 Plus
• Class Premiere CP661
• Pirelli P6
• Sime Astar 100
• Toyo Teo Plus Eco
• Yokohama A.drive

Tests were conducted by Peter Horvath and Michael Hohl, who evaluated how the tires hold their chosen trajectory at speeds of 85 and 80 km / h on dry surfaces, and 80 and 75 km / h on wet surfaces, for which they passed through a right turn with a radius of about 55 meters. During each test, the pilot did not know which tires were on the car.

During braking performance tests, pilots stopped at speeds of 50 and 80 km/h on both dry and wet surfaces to see how the tires would perform during emergency braking.

In addition, the level of rolling noise was also evaluated - at a speed of 50 and 80 km / h on an uneven surface. In both tests, the difference between the noise of all tires did not exceed 3 dB, so a person can hardly notice it. Be that as it may, all the tires in the test were new, so the differences may become more apparent as they wear.

Choice emphasizes that the performance of tires in emergency situations that rarely happen in everyday life was evaluated, so during everyday driving, the differences between the best tires may not be so noticeable.

At the same time, it is the tire's ability to cope with emergency maneuvers and heavy braking that is of paramount importance to guarantee maximum safety. Tires with a Buy rating (top six places) are more effective at helping you maintain control of your vehicle, possibly avoiding an accident.

During braking on a dry surface from a speed of 50 km/h, the results best tires(BFGoodrich and Goodyear) were only one meter better than the worst (, GT Radial, Ironman and Toyo). At a braking start speed of 80 km/h, the length stopping distance BFGoodrich was already four meters shorter than Ironman. This may already mean that where some tires can help avoid a collision, others can't, but the differences become even more frightening in wet tests - mainly due to Ironman, as these tires became the worst tires ever. Choice tests, and experts strongly advise against buying them. From 50 km/h, the Ironman stopped the car 6 meters further than Goodyear and Pirelli, the top performers, and when braking from 80 km/h, their stopping distance is already 15 meters longer than Goodyear's. However, even the tires that took second place from the end - Goodride, were much better.

Ironman showed the same sad results in the cornering test. These tires were the worst in dry tests, and on wet pavement and did hardly provide at least some grip on the road. BFGoodrich, Continental and Goodyear had the strongest dry lateral grip, while Goodyear took the lead in the wet.

Test results

Dry cornering (80 and 85 km/h)

Wet cornering (80 and 85 km/h)

Dry braking (from 50 and 80 km/h)

Wet braking (from 50 and 80 km/h)

Noise level at 50 km/h (dB)

Noise level at 80 km/h (dB)

Places in the test and Additional Information(weight of scores when compiling the overall rating: cornering on a dry surface - 30%; cornering on a wet surface - 30%; braking distance on a dry surface - 20%; braking distance on a wet surface - 20%. The maximum number of points is 100) .

In anticipation of the spring-summer season, the question of choosing high-quality rubber is acute. The gravity of this issue cannot be underestimated. Tires are one of the most important components of safe and comfortable driving.

In the article:

• the best summer tires R14;
• reviews;
• tests;
• video;
• prices;
• where could I buy.

Rating of the best summer tires 2018

It's time to figure out which summer tires are 14 better. Let's discuss the following brands in more detail:

• Toyo.
• Michelin.
• Nokian.
• Continental.
• Kumho.
• Bridgestone.
• matador.
• Hankook.
• Amtel.

Toyo

Ruler Shin Toyo NanoEnergy 3 is an excellent solution for compact and medium sized vehicles.

Characteristics

The average price is 2300 rubles per piece.

• no noise;
• fuel efficiency.

• long braking distance on wet surfaces;
• sensitivity to road bumps.

The cabin is much quieter. Fuel consumption has decreased, a trifle - but nice. Road grip is excellent, the speed of 120 km / h is simply not felt. When braking, the car stops as if rooted to the spot. By the way, it slows down the same way on dry pavement and on wet pavement. On wet pavement, the car does not drive. Of the minuses, probably too soft sidewalls.

One of the most popular and frequently used is the class budget cars. The purpose of the article is to give short description and submit a rating of summer tires 175 65 14, which are used on cars in this category. We will analyze tires from various manufacturers, present the test results in various conditions.

budget cars

Influence specifications: tread depth, pattern profile, rubber behavior on different speeds, which characterize the stability vehicle on the road. This is taken into account when buying tires, the cost is not the main indicator when choosing. Moreover, in this segment there is no big difference in price. Sometimes models famous brand With high cost inferior in road performance tires of less popular brands.

It is worth paying attention to the date of manufacture - wheels that have lain in a warehouse for a long time in conditions unacceptable for storage lose their original qualities. The date of manufacture is indicated on the side surface of the tire and consists of four digits. The first two are the week, the second two are the year of issue.

Testing summer tires 175/65 R14

Tires passed the test Russian manufacturers(Nizhnekamsk, Omsk, Kirovsk), Ukrainian tires Rosava, as well as Continental and Barum, Medeo Summer from Poland and wheels of the Korean company Nexen Dark.

Summer tires 175 65 r14 were tested for gliding stability on water. The landfill is equipped with a water tank, with a level of one centimeter. With one wheel, the car moves on water, the other on dry asphalt. If the tread pattern does not remove water from the contact patch of rubber with asphalt, then a water film is formed, which prevents stable control.

Cordiant tires production of the Russian Federation reached the best level. In second place are Continental, who scored the highest score on a ten-point scale. The water-wicking tread pattern on these models contributed to such a high result. Korean tires have the worst performance manufacturer Nexen Dark, Rosava and Tunga Road. The hydroplaning of the Amtel Planet and Barum tires is lower - eight and nine points, respectively. Kama Euro-224 and Matador Prima have a slightly worse result - the final score is seven points. Kama-217 and Medeo Summer have 6.

The second test was passing a corner with a chute filled with water up to the 5 mm mark, at an average speed of 63 km/h. Max Speed passage - 93 km / h. According to the test results, the places were distributed as follows:

— Amtel and Cordiant took first and second places. Barum tires, despite the high price, are much lower.

— Tunga and Nexen tires turned out to be outsiders in this race.

The brake track of the car on a dry test site (tires were installed on Chevrolet Aveo) showed the first result for Continental tires - 10 points. The second position belongs to Nexen - 9 points. Good performance on dry pavement, the Tunga tires have a score of 8. Kama Euro-224, Matador and Kama-217 tires are next to the rating scale. The last place with a mark of 7 points is occupied by Rosava, too large black stripes on the surface - maximum wear during braking.

Next up is comfort. The noise level of tires on the go is determined. The tests are carried out at a speed of 70 km/h. The results shown by summer tires 175 65 r14: the tires of the Korean company Nexen are the most “quiet”. First place and summary - 10 points. "Noisy" tires turned out to be Kama Euro-224-6 points. Tires Continental, surprisingly, showed 7 units, but this proves that the company's designers pay more attention to safety than comfort.

Summer tire brand rating 175/65 R14

According to the test results, we conclude that the emphasis in manufacturing is on quality. Therefore, the rating of summer tires 175 65 14 - was distributed as follows.

1. Brand Continental - Portugal. Multi-directional pattern on a treadmill with a depth of 7.9 mm, weighing six kilograms. Maximum speed - 190 km / h. The overall score based on the results of all tests is 9.8 points.

   Tires

2. Barum Brillantis - Romania. Drainage longitudinal grooves on the tread with a pattern depth of 7.8 mm. Weight seven kilograms. The speed is limited - 190 km / h. Rating - 8.4 points. Significant gap from the first place.

   Tires Barum Brillantis

3. Amtel Planet T-301 - Kirov Plant. The transverse grooves of the pattern increase water drainage. Tread depth - 8.1 mm. Permissible speed - 210 km / h. Rating - 8.3 points.

   Tires Amtel Planet T-301

4. Cordiant Sport W1 is a production association of Omskshina. Improved wet traction. Weight seven kilograms. Tread depth - 7 mm. Permissible speed limit - 210 km / h. The best value for money. The test score is 8.1 points.

   Tires Cordiant Sport W1

5. Medeo Summer - the original manufacturer in Yaroslavl (subsequently transferred to the Poles). Tires from a Polish manufacturer were tested. Tread depth - 7.9 mm. Weight - 6.8 kilograms. The maximum for acceleration is 190 km / h. Good tires for dry pavement. Expert assessment - 7.6 points.

   Medeo Summer tires

6. Model Nexen Dark - summer tires 175 65 r14, South Korea. Excellent stopping power on dry pavement. Increased wear resistance of the tread with a pattern depth of 8.3 mm. Weight 7.5 kg. Maximum speed - 210 km / h. The result of the general tests is 7.4 points.

   Tires Dark

7. The seventh place was given to the Nizhnekamsk plant and the Kama Euro-224 model. The size differs from the previous ones, so we will not consider in detail. Note overall score – 7,3.

   Tires Kama Euro-224

8. Matador Prima MP-14 is a model of summer tires in size 175 75 r14 produced by the Omsk plant. Mishelin style tread with 8.2mm depth. The maximum speed is 190 km / h. The sum of expert scores is 7.2.

   Tires Matador Prima MP-14

9. All-weather radial tire Kama-217 - Nizhnekamsk. Tires are equipped with cars of the VAZ family. Weight 7.7 kg. At higher speeds, the directional stability is at the level, but the braking qualities are unsatisfactory. Expert assessment - 7.1 points.

   Tires Kama-217

10. In this article, we consider summer tires 175 65r14, so a separate section will be devoted to the expert evaluation of the Rosava and Tunga Road models.

If the tire test results helped you prepare for the summer season, and you used the information received to buy tires for your car, then please leave a comment.

Tests of summer tires 185/60R14 allow you to compare tires from different brands, identify the advantages and disadvantages of rubber. After reviewing the tire ratings compiled on the basis of independent testing, you can choose the best option for your car.

R14 summer tire tests make it possible to compare the following characteristics of tires from different brands:

1. Aquaplaning. This term refers to a decrease in the adhesion of tires to the roadway, leading to partial or complete loss of control over the machine.
2. Braking. The distance that the car travels from the moment the braking system is reset to a complete stop is calculated.
3. Handling is the speed at which tires respond to steering commands.
4. Vehicle stability. The ability of tires to resist rollover or skidding of the vehicle is calculated.
5. Wear. This concept refers to the rate of abrasion of tires in contact with the roadway while the car is moving.
6. Profitability. The fuel consumption is calculated, if the pressure inside the tires is distributed correctly, then the amount of fuel consumed by the car decreases.
7. Noise. Affects driving comfort, depends on the noise emitted by the tires while the car is moving.
8. Rigidity. Summer tires should not be too soft.
9. Resistant to high temperatures.

The highest quality P14 tires for the summer showed good results in most tests and took a leading position.

First place

In the manufacture of this rubber, innovative technologies were used. This allowed to reduce the weight of the product and noise while driving. Tires provide excellent handling of the machine. Advantages:

• high level of comfort, noise inside the car decreased by 1 dB;
• environmental friendliness, the product is subject to full utilization;
• a special sipe system reduces the risk of aquaplaning;
• quick response to steering commands;
• reduction in fuel consumption;
• reduced rolling resistance.

Disadvantages: smoothness is not the highest among the presented brands.

Second place

The best option tires for the summer, manufactured by a Finnish company. Intended for cars, products are recommended for use in regions where the air temperature is not more than 35 0 C. Tires provide a high level of machine controllability. Advantages:

• stability when driving on a wet road surface;
• vehicle maneuverability;
• tires practically do not heat up;
• increased resource;
• environmental friendliness;
• provide quiet, comfortable driving;
• low fuel consumption.

Disadvantages: There are no significant disadvantages.

Third place

Tires made from rubber compound, the basis of which is silicate and synthetic rubber. Thanks to this composition, excellent braking of the car on wet roads is ensured, fuel consumption is significantly reduced. Advantages:

• resistance to damage and deformation;
• reduction in fuel consumption;
• driving comfort;
• tires absorb noise;
• provide controllability of the vehicle in difficult weather conditions;
• resistant to uneven wear;
• no hydroplaning effect.

Disadvantages: the average exchange rate among competitors.

Fourth place

These tires belong to the premium class, developed using a thermoplastic rubber compound, provide vehicle braking on wet road surfaces. Tires are suitable for driving in the city and on country roads. Advantages:

• reduction of rolling resistance;
• fast braking;
• reduction in fuel consumption;
• high level of comfort;
• little noise.

Weaknesses: handling and directional stability on dry surfaces is not the highest among the tested brands.

Fifth place

Tires are designed with special technologies to reduce vibration and reduce fuel consumption, suitable for driving on suburban roads. Advantages:

• effective braking on wet or dry pavement;
• driving comfort;
• environmental friendliness;
• economical when driving at high and medium speeds.

Disadvantages: average tire response to steering commands when driving on dry pavement.

Sixth place

These tires are designed for a wide range of vehicles. They have a directional tread pattern. Suitable for driving around the city and country roads. Advantages:

• good directional stability of the machine;
• maneuverability of the vehicle when cornering;
• lack of aquaplaning;
• reduction in fuel consumption;
• slight noise;
• good grip of the tire with the road surface.

Weaknesses: When driving on wet road surfaces, the average indicator of handling and smoothness.

Seventh place

• lack of aquaplaning effect;
• improved handling on wet road surfaces;
• tires are almost silent;
• reduction in fuel consumption.

Cons: own the best sides tires show while driving on a flat road surface, directional stability is low. The rubber is pretty hard.

Eighth place

These tires are designed for cars. Perfectly proved at high-speed driving. Advantages:

• dynamic acceleration;
• resistance to external mechanical influences;
• a clear course when driving on a dry road;
• no noise while driving.

Drawbacks:

• long braking on dry pavement;
• difficult handling on wet roads;
• increase in fuel consumption.

ninth place

The tires have a block tread structure that allows the wheels to respond quickly to steering commands. Tires have proven themselves well for driving on dirt roads, as well as country roads. Advantages:

• high permeability;
• average braking performance on various road surfaces;
• are a budget option;
• noise reduction.

Flaws:

• increased fuel consumption;
• the occurrence of the effect of aquaplaning when moving at high speeds on a wet road surface.

Tenth place

Tires are designed for SUVs. They have an asymmetric tread pattern. Suitable for country roads and urban conditions, designed for the movement of the car on the road surface good quality. Advantages:

• average course stability;
• reduced fuel consumption

Flaws:

• weak braking on wet surfaces;
• too tough.

Eleventh place

These tires are designed with a special tread layer for dynamic driving. Products are perfect for long trips. Advantages:

• average wheel reactions to steering commands;
• noiseless driving;
• reduced fuel consumption;
• comfort;
• large operational resource;
• resistance to mechanical stress.

Disadvantages: Difficulty in driving when performing emergency maneuvers.

Twelfth place

The composition of these tires is environmentally friendly, consists of self-renewable substances that do not harm nature and people. When driving on suburban roads, they allow you to minimize fuel consumption. Advantages:

• reduction of fuel consumption by 10%;
• driving comfort;
• improved grip when driving on wet road surfaces;
• practically silent.

Flaws:

• low course stability;
• possible loss of control during extreme maneuvering;
• slow rebuilding speed.

thirteenth place

Tires have a unique tread structure that provides dynamic acceleration and high speed performance when the vehicle is moving.

Advantages:

• low fuel consumption;
• noise reduction while driving;
• driving comfort.

Flaws:

• weak braking;
• insufficient vehicle control on dry and wet road surfaces;
• slow response to steering commands.

Fourteenth place

Tires have proven themselves well for driving on country roads with a hard road surface. Tires practically do not create resistance while the car is moving and thus helps to reduce the consumption of the fuel mixture.

Advantages:

• normal course stability;
• driving comfort;
• long operating period;
• hydroplaning resistance.
• fuel economy.

Flaws:

• slow braking;
• insufficient vehicle controllability on dry and wet road surfaces when performing emergency maneuvers.

Fifteenth place

The composition of the rubber compound from which these tires are made includes a compound. It allows the tires not to heat up while the car is moving. The unique tread provides grip on the road surface.

• the lowest rate of braking and rearrangement speed among competitors;
• slow rubber response to steering commands;
• poor course stability;
• too tough.

Conclusion

The choice of P14 tires in our time is quite large. Manufacturers offer a wide range of products with different quality characteristics. Therefore, it is quite difficult to choose tires on your own, you need to spend time comparing the parameters of rubber from different brands. To simplify the choice of motorists, independent experts conduct tire tests, leave reviews, ratings of products offered in the car market.

Which tires showed the best performance can be judged by the results of the R14 summer tire test. It should be borne in mind that tires that have taken a leading position may not be suitable for the operating conditions of your car, plus they are not a budget option. Therefore, it is worth familiarizing yourself with the advantages and disadvantages of all brands in order to choose the best option.

Specialists of the French magazine L "Argus compared budget-class tires, 5 took part in the test summer tires from third tier brands. Among budget tires the tire was tested and premium class.

All major tire manufacturers offer their customers second-tier brand tires - BFGoodrich from Michelin, Uniroyal from Continental, Fulda from Goodyear, etc. Installing these tires can help you save a lot, but if you want to increase your savings even more, you need to turn to third-tier brands such as Kormoran, Barum or Sava. So, in their test of budget summer tires, the French experts took five tires, the price of which on the French market varies from 38 to 45 euros per piece. For greater clarity, L’Argus magazine decided to buy premium tires for comparison - Dunlop worth 52 euros. The Dunlop SP StreetResponse tires allowed the experts not only to compare the performance of third tier brands, but also to monitor the changing conditions during the tests.

The tests were carried out at the Goodyear Dunlop test site in Mireval (France), as well as in the company's laboratory in Luxembourg. The handling tests used two Ford Fiesta 1.0 Ecoboost compact hatchbacks, and the rest of the tests used a Fiesta 1.6. The tires were inflated according to the manufacturer's recommendations (2.1 bar front and 1.8 rear). All tested tires were purchased from general stores.

Braking on wet pavement

• Braking was carried out from 50 and 80 to 1 km/h, after which the length of the braking distance to a complete stop was calculated. To determine the change in conditions (wind, air humidity, temperature), reference data were used. Dunlop tires. As part of each test, the test pilots made five races.

Braking on wet pavement from a speed of 50 km/h, meters

• When braking from 50 km/h, the premium Dunlops were the best, but three of the budget tires. At the same time, the last Dayton tires took 2.5 meters more to stop than the Dunlops. With an increase in the speed of the start of braking to 80 km / h, they go forward Kormoran tires and Sava, with the former stopping more than 2 meters earlier than the more expensive Dunlops. As for Dayton, they get a red card in this discipline, as their braking distance is almost 8 meters more than that of Kormoran, which is the length of two Renault Clios.

Braking on wet pavement at a speed of 80 km/h, meters

Braking on dry pavement

• The test pilots stopped the car from speeds of 90 and 130 to 1 km/h, after which they also determined the braking distance to 0 km/h. On dry pavement, the failed Dayton tires performed best.

Dry pavement braking move from a speed of 90 km/h, meters

• If from a speed of 90 km / h Dayton tires stopped the car before all other tires, then with an increase in the start of braking to 130 km / h, they gave way to Sava tires. The last places in both disciplines were taken by Kingstar and Barum, with the last tires from 130 km/h stopping the car 5 m further than the leader of this test Sava.

Braking on dry pavement at a speed of 130 km/h, meters

Longitudinal hydroplaning resistance

• As part of this discipline, the car moved along the track, half of which was covered with a 7 mm layer of water. The test pilots gradually increased the speed by 5 km / h, the test was carried out until the tires began to lose grip on wet roads. The higher the speed that tires can withstand, the more resistant they are to hydroplaning.

Successful passage of this test is possible only with a well-designed tread pattern. So the first places in this discipline are occupied by Dunlop and Sava, which have wide longitudinal grooves. Kormoran also showcase good result, and the Barum and especially the Kingstar and Dayton start to "float" at relatively low speeds.

Speed ​​of loss of grip with the roadway, km/h

Handling on dry and wet pavement

• The wet handling test was carried out on an irrigated track with a constantly maintained water depth. Parameters such as traction, lateral stability, maneuverability, corner entry grip, braking efficiency and information content were evaluated. Dry track tests were carried out in the same way.

• On a wet track, the tires were divided into two groups - leaders and laggards. The Dunlop and Kormoran tires behaved very similarly, both showed good handling and predictable behavior at the grip limit, the Sava tires showed similar characteristics. But tires Kingstar, Dayton and Barum could not boast of decent results on a wet road surface. The Kingstar tires are noticeably lacking in traction, with the Dayton skidding easily in corners and then finding traction again with great difficulty. and Barum do behave very nervously, and their reactions to steering generally quite difficult to predict. On a dry track, the differences between the tires were less pronounced, but even there the Barum lagged far behind its competitors.

Handling on wet surfaces

• This test was carried out in accordance with industry standards using two microphones on both sides of the track and a sonometer that measures the loudness of the noise in decibels with the car engine turned off. Test pilots made eight races on each tire. The 3dB difference between the quietest Kormoran and the last-tied three tires is significant, as it means twice the volume to human hearing, and it will also be noticeable in the cabin.

rolling resistance

• Prior to this test, each tire, inflated to 2.1 bar, was rotated on the bench at 120 km/h without load for three hours. After that, it was subjected to pressure equivalent to 80% of the maximum load that the tire must withstand. After several measurements, it was determined what energy is needed to move a car weighing 1 ton.
• Tires account for up to 20% of fuel consumption, recently tire manufacturers have been especially concerned about such characteristics of tires as rolling resistance and are trying to reduce it while not allowing deterioration of other performance characteristics. At the same time, experts remind that in order for tires to really reduce fuel consumption, it is necessary to regularly monitor the pressure level.
• There were no so-called "green" tires among the test participants. The most economical expensive tires Dunlop and here is the setup Sava tires or Kormoran could noticeably increase fuel costs.